U.S. Supreme Court Limits Shareholder Class-Action Suits

The U.S. Supreme Court gave Halliburton Co. a partial victory recently, putting further restrictions on class-actions lawsuits by shareholders just shy of eradicating such suits altogether. Halliburton tried to overturn twenty-six year old precedent and end class-action fraud suits over securities brought on public exchanges. A divided court declined to do so, and Chief Justice John Roberts stated that Halliburton had not shown "the kind of fundamental shift in economic theory" that would warrant overruling the precedent. The court did, however, make it easier for defendants to prevent approval of a class action. Roberts stated that a defendant can prevent such approval by showing that an alleged misstatement had no effect on a company's stock price. The precedent in this case comes from Basic v. Levinson, a 1988 case which stated that judges considering misrepresentation claims should presume that investors will take any public misstatement into account before buying shares. The shareholders, with the Erica P. John Fund at the [...]

By |June 24th, 2014|Uncategorized|

Retirees Suffer As Rollover Boom Enriches Brokers

Thirty-seven former clients have filed complaints against Kathleen Tarr, a broker who worked for Royal Alliance Associates, after encouraging hundreds of departing AT&T employees to roll over their retirement money into the type of risky high-commission investments that FINRA warns about. These complaints, together with similar complaints against other brokers, underscore a massive rollover boom in the U.S. Former employees shifted $321 billion from 401(k)-style plans to IRAs in 2012, an increase of approximately 60% in one decade. While generally retirees can leave their savings in 401(k) plans, financial firms lure them in with cold calls, Internet advertisements, storefront signs, and cash incentives to switch to IRAs, lauding the advantage of the IRA's expansive variety of investment choices over those of 401(k) plans. However, IRAs are associated with expensive and high-risk investments, and they often charge higher fees than those associated with 401(k) plans, providing brokers an incentive to promote rollovers. Given this incentive for brokers to promote rollovers, federal [...]

SEC Examining Possible Changes To The Definition Of “Accredited Investor”

The SEC is currently examining potential changes to its definition of “accredited investor.” Section 413(b)(2)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 states that the SEC must examine the definition of "accredited investors" under the Securities Act of 1933 every four years to determine whether it should be changed "for the protection of investors, in the public interest and in light of the economy." Currently, an individual qualifies as an "accredited investor" regarding participation in private offerings of securities under Rule 506 of the Securities Act if the investor has at least $200,000 in annual income in each of the two most recent years or $1 million in net worth without taking primary residence into account. SEC chair Mary Jo White wrote a letter in November of last year detailing the SEC’s plan regarding the definition, indicating that the SEC is examining Whether the existing net worth and income tests are appropriate measures that should continue to be used; Whether individuals [...]

Jefferies Agrees To Pay $25 million For Mortgage Backed SecuritiesViolations

The Securities and Exchange Commission has charged global investment bank and brokerage firm Jefferies LLC with failing to supervise its employees who sold mortgage-backed securities desk and were in turn lying to customers about pricing . An SEC investigation found that Jefferies representatives including Jesse Litvak, who the SEC charged with securities fraud last year, lied to customers about the prices that the firm paid for certain mortgage-backed securities. Lying about those prices mislead customers about the true amount of profits being earned by the firm in its trading. Jefferies’ policy required supervisors to review the electronic communications of traders and salespeople in order to flag any untrue or misleading information provided customers. However, the policy was not implemented in a way to detect misrepresentations about price . Jefferies agreed to pay $25 million to settle the SEC’s charges as well as a parallel action announced today by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Connecticut. […]

By |March 14th, 2014|Uncategorized|