NO FEES UNTIL WE WIN
FREE CONSULTATION
Often there is only one forum in which to seek justice when securities fraud or malpractice occurs. However, if the investment contract did not include a mandatory arbitration clause, then a state or federal civil claim may be an option.
The Frankowski Firm explains where claims for broker fraud or negligence must or can be brought. Where there are multiple options, our securities fraud lawyers explain the pros and cons of each type of action. In addition to trying many cases in FINRA arbitrations, our lawyers have tried cases in state and federal court.


Mediation is a less formal alternative to arbitration. The aim of mediation is to reach an agreement instead of having someone make a formal, binding decision. Mediators are neutral parties whose sole purpose is to facilitate a settlement. The mediator assists the parties in reaching an agreement that is acceptable to both sides. If the parties agree to mediate, they can attempt to resolve their case with this non-binding process. If the case is not settled, their claims will proceed to arbitration
Arbitration has some advantages and disadvantages over state or federal court trials. In arbitration:
Our attorneys can help you understand the difference between arbitration and litigation, and help you decide if arbitration is the right choice for your situation.

The Frankowski Firm advises clients that have been injured by stockbrokers, supervisors, or brokerage firms who breached their fiduciary duty, acted fraudulently or negligently, made unsuitable investment recommendations, or proceeded unprofessionally. Most of the claims we bring for our investors are through FINRA arbitration. If a civil court trial is an option, we will pursue those claims in state and federal court. To contact The Frankowski Firm, please call 888-741-7503 or fill out our contact form

1

2

3