+1-888-741-7503
NO FEES UNTIL WE WIN
FREE CONSULTATION
NO FEES UNTIL WE WIN
FREE CONSULTATION
Every year, thousands of retirees discover that their broker placed their life savings into high-risk investments they were never meant to own. Non-traded REITs, private placements, leveraged ETFs, speculative stocks: these products can generate enormous commissions for the broker while draining a retiree’s fixed-income portfolio. If this happened to you or someone you love, the losses may be recoverable.
If you are a retiree who lost money on investments that did not match your risk tolerance or income needs, call The Frankowski Firm at 888-741-7503 for a free, confidential consultation. We only get paid when you do.
Federal securities regulations and FINRA rules require brokers to recommend only investments that are suitable for each individual client. When a broker ignores a retiree’s conservative profile and sells aggressive products to earn bigger commissions, that broker has broken the law. This article explains what makes an investment unsuitable for retirees, the rules your broker was supposed to follow, and how to recover your losses through FINRA arbitration.
An investment is unsuitable when it does not align with the investor’s financial situation, risk tolerance, investment objectives, age, income needs, or time horizon. For retirees, suitability is especially important because they depend on their savings to cover living expenses and cannot wait years for a risky bet to pay off.
Retirees typically need investments that preserve capital and generate steady income. When a broker instead sells products designed for aggressive growth or speculative returns, the mismatch between the product and the client creates a suitability claim.
Certain investment products appear repeatedly in suitability complaints filed by retired investors:
The common thread: these products generate higher commissions for the broker than conservative alternatives like Treasury bonds, CDs, or diversified bond funds. A broker who prioritizes commissions over a retiree’s financial safety has violated fundamental industry rules.
Two overlapping regulatory frameworks govern what a broker can recommend to a retiree.
FINRA Rule 2111 requires that a broker have a “reasonable basis” to believe a recommended investment is suitable for the client, based on the client’s investment profile. This profile includes age, financial situation, tax status, investment objectives, investment experience, time horizon, liquidity needs, and risk tolerance.
The rule applies at three levels:
Since June 2020, the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest has added another layer of protection. Reg BI requires broker-dealers to act in their client’s “best interest” when making recommendations, without placing their own financial interests ahead of the client’s. While not as strict as a full fiduciary duty, Reg BI goes beyond the older suitability standard by requiring brokers to:
For retirees, Reg BI means a broker cannot simply claim that a high-risk product was “disclosed.” The broker must also demonstrate that the recommendation was in the client’s interest given their specific circumstances.
Wondering whether your broker violated investment suitability rules or Reg BI? Contact The Frankowski Firm for a free case evaluation. We represent investors nationwide on a contingency-fee basis, which means you pay nothing unless we recover your losses.
Unsuitable investment sales to retirees often go unchallenged for months or years because of several factors that work in the broker’s favor.
Many retirees have worked with the same broker or financial advisor for years, sometimes decades. That relationship creates a level of trust that can be exploited. When a trusted advisor recommends a new investment, the retiree may not question the recommendation or understand the risks involved.
Brokerage account statements are notoriously difficult to read. Losses can be obscured by combining realized and unrealized gains and losses, and many retirees do not review their statements closely enough to notice gradual erosion of their portfolio.
The financial services industry still relies heavily on commission-based compensation. A broker who sells a non-traded REIT may earn a 7% commission compared to less than 1% on a Treasury bond. That financial incentive creates a direct conflict between the broker’s income and the retiree’s financial safety. According to the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), unsuitable investments remain one of the top threats to senior investors year after year.
Many seniors feel embarrassed about investment losses and blame themselves for trusting the wrong person. Others do not know that they have legal options or assume the process is too expensive. That reluctance benefits brokers who count on victims not filing complaints.
The scope of this problem is staggering. Consider these figures:
These numbers represent real people: grandparents who lost their retirement savings, widows who were sold products they did not understand, and veterans who trusted the wrong advisor with their pensions. If any of this sounds familiar, learn how to spot investment fraud red flags.
The primary legal avenue for recovering losses from unsuitable investments is FINRA arbitration. When you opened your brokerage account, you almost certainly signed an agreement requiring that any disputes be resolved through FINRA’s arbitration process rather than in court.
This is actually an advantage for investors. FINRA arbitration is faster than litigation, less expensive, and decided by a panel that includes individuals with securities industry knowledge.
Most FINRA arbitration cases are resolved within 12 to 18 months from filing, significantly faster than traditional court litigation. For more details on the process, see our guide to the FINRA arbitration process.
Through FINRA arbitration, investors may recover:
The Frankowski Firm has recovered over a million dollars in single-investor awards and has represented hundreds of investors in FINRA arbitration proceedings across the country. Many of these cases involved breach of fiduciary duty and failure to diversify retiree portfolios.
Do not let the statute of limitations run out. FINRA requires that claims be filed within six years of the events giving rise to the dispute. Call 888-741-7503 to speak with an attorney who can evaluate your case at no cost.
If you believe your broker sold you investments that were too risky for your situation, take these steps to protect your rights:
The Frankowski Firm is a securities law firm founded by Richard S. Frankowski, who has spent over 25 years representing investors in FINRA arbitration cases. The firm has recovered millions of dollars for clients who were sold unsuitable investments by their brokers, including cases involving elder financial abuse by financial advisors.
What sets this firm apart:
An unsuitable investment is one that does not match the retiree’s risk tolerance, income needs, time horizon, or overall financial situation. For a retiree living on fixed income, high-risk products like non-traded REITs, private placements, leveraged ETFs, or speculative stocks are generally considered unsuitable because they expose the investor to losses they cannot afford and cannot recover from over time.
FINRA requires that claims be filed within six years of the events that gave rise to the dispute. State statutes of limitations may also apply. Because these deadlines vary and can be complex, it is important to consult a securities attorney as soon as you suspect a problem.
Not at The Frankowski Firm. The firm works on a contingency-fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless the firm successfully recovers your losses. There are no hourly rates, retainers, or hidden costs.
Yes. In most cases, the brokerage firm that employed the broker is responsible for supervising the broker’s conduct. You can file a FINRA arbitration claim against both the individual broker and the firm. Even if the broker has moved to a different company or left the industry entirely, the firm where the misconduct occurred typically remains liable.
Signing disclosure documents does not waive your right to file a suitability claim. Brokers are required to go beyond paperwork disclosures and ensure that the investment is genuinely appropriate for your specific financial situation. If a broker pushed a high-risk product on a conservative retiree, the fact that the retiree signed a risk disclosure does not excuse the broker’s misconduct.
Retirees who were sold unsuitable investments have legal rights that many do not know about. FINRA arbitration provides a proven path to recover losses caused by broker misconduct, and the process does not require an upfront financial commitment when you work with a contingency-fee firm.
The Frankowski Firm has represented over 2,000 investors and recovered millions of dollars through FINRA arbitration. If you or a family member lost money on investments that did not match your needs or risk tolerance, time is limited.
Call 888-741-7503 or contact us online for a free, confidential case evaluation. There is no obligation and no cost to find out whether you have a claim.