FINRA SANCTIONS FIFTH THIRD SECURITIES, INC. OVER VARIABLE ANNUITY EXCHANGES

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has announced a fine of $4 million and required an additional $2 million in restitutionary damages from Fifth Third Securities, Inc. for its failures to consider and accurately describe the costs and benefits of variable annuity exchanges, and for recommending variable annuity exchanges without a reasonable basis to believe the exchanges were suitable. According to the FINRA release, Fifth Third’s principals approved approximately 92 percent of the variable annuity exchange applications submitted to them for review, even though such exchanges are complex investments with costs that may outweigh the potential benefits of the transaction. In a random sample of Fifth Third’s variable annuity exchanges from 2013 to 2015, FINRA found that Fifth Third had misstated or omitted at least one material fact related to the costs or benefits of the exchange in approximately 77 percent of the reviewed transactions. Variable annuities are complex investments that are high-cost vehicles with a handful of narrow benefits [...]

FRANKOWSKI FIRM INVESTIGATING POTENTIAL CLAIMS AGAINST FORMER WELLS FARGO BROKER JEFFREY PALISH

The Frankowski Firm is investigating potential claims against terminated Wells Fargo broker Jeffrey Palish, of Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey, following Mr. Palish’s arrest and termination from the securities industry on charges that he stole at least $600,000 from elderly clients over four years. According to the story published at northjersey.com, Mr. Palish is believed to have borrowed $100,000 from two of his clients, failed to report the loan to his employer, and failed to make payments on the loan. Moreover, Mr. Palish allegedly stole money from his clients by converting their stock holdings, which he sold and the money placed into a separate bank through checks written by his clients. Palish is also accused of completing approximately 40 unauthorized wire transfers to make payments on his personal credit card, totaling $300,000. If you or someone you know lost money as a client of Jeffrey Palish or Wells Fargo due to unsuitable, misrepresented, or unauthorized transactions, please call the Frankowski Firm [...]

By |March 5th, 2018|Uncategorized|

Wells Fargo Punished for Selling Risky Investments It Didn’t Understand

Last week, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) ordered Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC to pay more than $3.4 million in restitution to investors based on Wells Fargo’s unsuitable recommendation of volatility-linked exchange-traded products (ETPs) and related supervisory failures. FINRA found that between July 2010 and May 2012, certain Wells Fargo representatives recommended their clients purchase volatility-linked ETPs, selling them as a long-term hedge on their customers’ equity positions in the event of a market downturn. Instead, volatility-linked ETPs are generally short-term products that lose value significantly over time and are not suitable as part of a long-term buy-and-hold strategy. FINRA further found that Wells Fargo failed to implement a reasonable system to supervise sales of these solicited purchases during the time period at issue. This is the most recent regulatory run-in for Wells Fargo, which admitted in August to having found up to 3.5 million potentially fake bank and credit card accounts [...]

By |October 25th, 2017|Uncategorized|

FINRA Punishes Morgan Stanley for Pushing Variable Annuity on Unsuitable Investor

An arbitration panel of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has ordered Morgan Stanley to pay $200,000 plus interest to one if its customers while also rescinding her investment in a variable annuity, with a waiver of any surrender fees. The panel found that although the Morgan Stanley broker, Helen Holmes Timpe (formerly of the Morgan Stanley branch office in Newport Beach, California) placed the customer in a SunAmerica variable annuity in November 2013, it was not clear that the customer actually authorized the purchase until January 2014. The Panel further found that the claimant was first informed about the fees associated with the annuity via a prospectus after it was too late and the purchase had already been made. Moreover, the claimant alleged that she was promised a six percent rate of return which she did not receive. This award is the latest example of FINRA’s emphasis on punishing and deterring variable annuity misconduct. Variable annuities are insurance products [...]

By |October 18th, 2017|Uncategorized|